Old-fashioned campaigning
Philip Hammond (Conservative, Runnymede and Weybridge, majority 22,134) and David Davis (Conservative, Haltemprice and Howden, majority 16,195) came out with a very familiar pictorial backdrop to illustrate Labour's latest "tax bombshell". You have to get these things in at the right time, before the opposition manifesto is out, to fix the idea of their irresponsibility in people's minds.Needless to say, some of the policy items which contribute to the "£45 billion black hole" (they could do these events in their sleep) won't actually be in the manifesto when it comes, but the number will stick. John McDonnell (Labour, Hayes and Harlington, majority 15,700) can splutter about "lies" all he wants, but he'll have to brief his fellow spokespeople better to have a chance of countering these stunts.
Hammond and Davis didn't point to their own record, and many Labourites will probably forget to mention it as well.
Philip Hammond rightly says deficit is down by three-quarters.— Jim Pickard (@PickardJE) May 3, 2017
Yet he doesn't mention that total debt has nearly doubled under the Tories.
Meanwhile, nominations for constituencies in Northern Ireland suggest that the various Unionist parties have agreed a deal to allow a single candidate a free run in each of "their" seats.
And the BBC has been out vox popping again, finding people (8 out of 30 interviewed) who don't know there's an election in June.
The Michel Barnier Show
The EU's lead Brexit negotiator came out for a press conference in Brussels to introduce the documents released by the Commission today which define a negotiating process in two stages. Pointedly, Barnier only has a mandate for the first stage, plus the responsibility to recommend when "sufficient progress" has been made on stage 1 to proceed to stage 2.Stage 1 - elements necessary to ensure an orderly withdrawal
- Citizens' rights
- Financial settlement
- Northern Ireland
- Governance and dispute resolution
To these I'd add a Stage 0, in which the two sides will argue about whether this structure is acceptable. May &co have maintained that the future UK-EU relationship must be negotiated in parallel with the withdrawal agreement if not actually as part of the same process. Any change would presumably need the approval of the EU Council, so we could see weeks of negotiating time taken up by talks about talks.
Barnier said at least twice that the British referendum had led to ten months of uncertainty, which needs to be resolved as soon as possible. He warned that leaving the EU would have consequences, in the personal, social, financial, legal etc fields, and that the British "know the complexities".
Issues to be resolved on citizens' rights in the UK and the rest of the EU include the cut-off date (EU wants rights for anybody making the move up to the date of withdrawal; various earlier dates have been mentioned in the UK), how long the rights should be protected (for life is the EU demand) and which law should enforce them (May &co aren't going to accept the ECJ). We could end up with some people in the UK who retain free movement rights and EU citizenship protections and some (merely British citizens) who don't.
Barnier denied that the financial settlement being requested is any kind of punishment or "exit tax". It's just "settling of accounts" based on commitments already made. He refused to mention any particular figure - not the "up to €60bn" hinted at by Ivan Rogers, or the "maybe €100bn" floated by the Financial Times on Wednesday morning - but insisted that a "methodology" for the calculation must be agreed as a precondition for moving on to any later discussions.
Little was said about the other main objective of stage 1 - Northern Ireland - but Barnier said he would be in Dublin next week.
Several questioners mentioned the leaks from last week's dinner but Barnier talked of that evening being the first time he had "had the honour" of meeting Theresa May and that he had attended with the attention of establishing an entente cordiale.
Sky's commentators on the session included Yanis Varoufakis, who recognised the Brussels technique - you give us everything we want, then we'll talk about what you want - and Gisela Stuart who said there is pressure from countries including Ireland and Holland which would ensure that trade is discussed earlier than the current EU timetable would allow.
The Theresa May show
#MrsME seems to have a cunning plan (thanks to @davidallengreen for the initial idea).
- Kick off the Article 50 process at a time of your own choosing.
- Call an election at a time of your own choosing.
- Invite Juncker and Barnier for dinner to show you're still doing the important things.
- Worry them with apparent unpreparedness so that they brief newspapers (this might not have been planned).
- Dismiss the leak as "Brussels gossip".
- Go to see the queen (those important things again) so the cameras are all following you.
- Make a speech complaining about interference in your election (no longer just "gossip" apparently) by an EU negotiator who's carrying on with the process you started at 1.
- Wait for the howls of outrage and endless TV repeats which that nice Mr Crosby assured you would come.
May didn't mention Tories or Conservatives once during 1,000-word No 10 speech.— Ben Riley-Smith (@benrileysmith) May 3, 2017
Saboteurs department
Osborne's at it again. The Standard looks likely to become required reading for a while at least.I... quite like this headline? It's cute. https://t.co/3xxqx1nCqe— Ian Dunt (@IanDunt) May 3, 2017
The Economist's man in Berlin, Jeremy Cliffe, who brought us an account of the dinner leak story in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung queries the declared purpose of #MrsME's election. Others have observed that a bigger majority would give her more chance to compromise with those evil, election-fixing foreigners, while yet others fear that all the new Tory MPs will be ardent young Brexiters.
This is unhinged and pathetically parochial. The EU institutions and the EU27 *could* *not* *care* *less* how big the Tory majority will be. https://t.co/yjjk7xB9Im— Jeremy Cliffe (@JeremyCliffe) May 3, 2017
Not everything is going #MrsME's way. Let's see whether ITV have the guts to go through with this one.
ITV will 'empty chair' Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn after they rule out a TV debate https://t.co/bZ7M6s1s0b via @BIUK_Politics— Jim Edwards (@Jim_Edwards) May 3, 2017
And I'm not alone in putting #MrsME in the saboteur column.
Turns out Theresa May is a more effective saboteur of the nation's interests than anyone the Daily Mail wanted "crushed" #Brussels #May pic.twitter.com/uo54Lu5Seo— Aaron Matthews (@AaronLMatthews) May 3, 2017